Posts Tagged ‘reduce energy’

City of NO Cars

August 29th, 2009

http://gmy.news.yahoo.com/vid/15288400/

U.S. plans subsidies for more efficient appliances

August 26th, 2009

Md. due to get $3.5 million in stimulus money

“Cash for clunkers” may have ended, but consumers will soon have a new way to get federal subsidies: a program that rewards anyone who buys an energy-efficient refrigerator, washing machine or other appliance.

The U.S. has set aside $300 million in stimulus money to give to the states to develop their own programs, and Maryland is slated to get $5.4 million.

The program is expected to spur cautious consumers to open their wallets and give a boost to ailing manufacturers, retailers and the environment.  Unlike “cash for clunkers,” however, there will be no trade-ins.  The only requirement is the purchase of a qualifying Energy Star model.

“We’re working with the utility companies that are already running appliance rebate programs,” said Christina Twomey Light, a spokeswoman for the Maryland Energy Administration, which will administer the program.  ”We know the money is coming, and we’re absolutely thrilled to put it to good use in near term.”

The state is formulating a plan to submit to federal officials by the Oct. 15 deadline.

Jen Stutsman, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of Energy, said each state will come up with its own plan. They are being encouraged to also include heating and cooling appliances and water heaters.

Those plans are coming in now and officials expect to approve them quickly, making rebate money available by the end of this year or early next year.  In light of the success of “cash for clunkers” – which resulted in an estimated 700,000 to 800,000 vehicles sold – states should be prepared for a quick response from consumers, she said.

Appliances with the government-backed Energy Star rating now account for more than half of sales. They use less water and energy than standard models.

According to BGE, an Energy Star refrigerator can save up to $112 in its lifetime because it requires only about half the energy of models made before 1993. The utility offers a $50 mail-in rebate for buying one.

The company also offers $50 for efficient clothes washers, which use 18-25 gallons of water, compared with 40 gallons on a standard washer, and $25 for qualified room air conditioners that use up to 35 percent less energy than a model 10 years older.  The company also offers rebates of up to $400 for heating and cooling systems bought at participating dealers and has other programs to help customers cut their energy use.

Kitchen Aid and GE also have rebate programs, and the federal government offers tax incentives for other energy-efficiency measures such as new windows and insulation and for alternative energy systems.  The state offers some matches.

“The whole idea is to offer programs that provide customers ways to manage their energy use,” said Ruth Kiselewich, who runs energy-efficiency programs for BGE. “We wanted to provide as many tools as possible so one customer can take advantage of one program and a different customer can take advantage of something else.”

She said the rebates and other new programs offered since April, such as quick energy audits, have been gaining popularity as customers learn about them, and could get another boost from the federal program.  Already, more than 100 people have sought appliance rebates and more than 2,000 have sought heating and cooling system rebates.

The federal rebate program will not require states to recycle old appliances.  Some utilities and retailers already offer recycling to their customers.  BGE says a refrigerator, for example, that is 10 years old will have more than 120 pounds of recyclable steel, and recycling one will save enough energy to run a new Energy Star machine for 8 months.

Jen King, a Home Depot spokeswoman, said the store probably sells a smaller percentage than that but interest from customers is up because of the cost savings.

“We’re always looking for ways to provide our customer extra value,” she said. “Each state has to come back with a plan, and we’re anxious to see what they come back with. We’re excited to be part of it.”

So are manufacturers.  ”Retiring older, less efficient appliances with Energy Star products is the single most cost-effective step a consumer can take to save money and energy,” said Joseph M. McGuire, Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers president, in a statement. “This rebate program was a top legislative priority of the industry to help stimulate demand and provide immediate energy and utility cost savings.”

Possible savings

Last year’s energy savings from Energy Star appliances could:

• Power 10 million homes

• Avoid greenhouse gas emissions from 12 million cars

• Save consumers $6 billion.

By Meredith Cohn

Lenders Catch on to the Value of Energy Efficiency

August 25th, 2009

Energy efficiency has  been described as everything from the new green to low hanging fruit to the fruit lying on the ground.  And while we have seen some progress in terms of home energy efficiency, barriers for homeowners remain.  Among the the top noted hurdles: Inertia (we can help) and cost.  A recent article in the Wall Street Journal brought to light several existing programs from lenders designed to increase the rate of energy efficiency retrofits in existing housing.  The piece provides a good assessment of these programs, which include the following:

- Homeowners seeking a second mortgage or refinancing may have the costs of energy efficiency upgrades bundled into the mortgage to be repaid over the life of the loan, so long as they agree to reduce their current energy usage by a certain amount.

- Purchasers of a newly constructed property that meets Energy Star standards may receive up to a$1,000 credit on closing costs that creep up on signing day.

- Borrowers wishing to increase their qualifying income level for loans may be able to use low monthly energy bills.  Participating lenders include: Bank of America’s Countrywide Financial, CitiMortgage, and lenders who sell their loans to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Here’s how the deal is described in the Wall Street Journal:

If borrowers earn $3,000 a month and save $400 on bills, the lender would consider their income $3,400. Borrowers can potentially add quite a bit to their qualifying income this way, since even simple fixes can bring big savings on energy bills. Air sealing, for instance, helps reduce heating and cooling costs by as much as 30%, and runs just $300 to $500 if you do it yourself, or $1,500 to $2,000 for a contractor.

While these are constructive steps, they are all mortgage-based approaches which, for the most part, have yet to ignite a broad efficiency fire.  There has been much discussion as to why this is the case, but it should come as no surprise, in this economic climate, that homeowners don’t have a 20-30 year investment horizon for efficiency.

A small credit on closing costs is positive, for sure, but incremental tweaks like this are drops in the bucket, and getting efficiency mobilized in a substantial way demands much larger thinking.

A promising program in play in Colorado and Maine that entitles homeowners to save on their interest rates comes closer to the mark, and feels more similar to the ingenious program developed by Architecture 2030, which entitles home owners to reduce their interest rate correlating directly to the percentage saved.

The key assumption in all of these programs is that home energy improvements increase the value of homes.  It is great to see mortgage markets beginning to reflect this, as the sooner housing markets recognize the tangible value of energy efficiency, the sooner we’ll get out of incrementalism start seeing the kind of massive fundamental change that our housing stock and our planet so desperately need.

By Peter Troast

Nine No-Cost Ways to Reduce Energy Use

August 10th, 2009

There’s a crispness to the air, and winter is again upon us. Colder temperatures and longer nights bring more frequent indoor gatherings with family and friends. But, if you’re anything like me, you’re having trouble socializing because you’re anticipating a spike in your energy bills.

The average American household spends about $1,900 annually on energy and also creates more than 26,000 pounds of carbon dioxide per year.  Collectively, residential energy use accounts for about 20 percent of the country’s greenhouse gas emissions.

We all want to be warm this season, and we often don’t mind the increased cost. In fact, some of us may view those increased energy costs in the winter as a necessary evil.

But what if you had some no-cost, quick and easy ways to reduce that energy bill while saving the environment and maintaining the same level of comfort?

Well, here you go.

The Rocky Mountain Institute recently compiled energy usage information for the typical American home. In the process, we found dozens of ways ordinary people can cost-effectively reduce carbon dioxide emissions from their own homes.

These nine suggestions cost nothing and will save you money:

CO2 Saved (lbs/year) $ Saved ($/year)
Lower water heater temperature to 120°F 214 $12.12
Lower thermostat in winter by 2°F 353 $19.04
Wash clothes in cold water 327 $18.58
Turn off unneeded lights 376 $21.04
Turn off home-office equipment 137 $7.68
Unplug extra fridge in garage 448 $25.04
Use energy-saving mode on appliances 769 $43.04
Increase AC thermostat by 3°F 339 $18.90
Air dry clothes during summer 779 $43.60
TOTAL SAVED PER YEAR: 3,742 $209.04

Not only can these free tricks save the average household more than $200 a year in energy costs, but the carbon dioxide reductions are equivalent to taking 10 miles off of your daily commute.

So be a do-gooder this season and year round, keep your guests happy, and give your pocketbook a boost, too.

http://www.proenergymd.com